|
The New Zealand Property Investors’ Federation
was pleased with IRD Assistant Commissioner Robin Oliver’s
view that investment in rental property receives tax
advantages. This is a view that has been spread around
by various groups over the years and it is good that
the IRD has publically corrected this false impression.
Many Investment or financial planners have spread
the view of tax benefits for rental property to advance
their own desires for favourable tax treatment in order
to sell more of their products. Some Property Investment
Seminar presenters and property sales people have also
given this impression so to help them sell seats to
their events and sell property.
At a meeting of the Finance Select Committee yesterday,
Mr Oliver confirmed to MP’s that rules about expenses
for deducting costs such as interest, upkeep and maintenance,
as well as paying tax on income were the same for investments
in shares or anything else.
Mr Oliver went further saying that the rules were tougher
for housing investment over other types of investment.
"In fact under the housing case, the capital gains
boundary is brought back a bit. There are tighter rules
to what is a capital gain," Mr Oliver said.
Mr Oliver said the concern appeared to be that housing
was easier to get and it was easier to get loans from
the bank to invest in property.
Andrew King, Vice President of the Property Investors
Federation, says that these false impressions have harmed
the public impression of property investors in New Zealand.
“Many people have the false impression that
rental property owners are somehow ripping off the IRD
and not paying their fair share.” Says King. “Clearly
this is not the case as rental property owners actually
provide a necessary service by housing a large proportion
of our population.”
“Many people do not realise that rental property
owners provide great value accommodation and this is
a key reason why more people are choosing to rent.”
Says King.
|